Environmental Law Portal

Welcome to the Beveridge & Diamond Environmental Law Portal.

Beveridge & Diamond’s 100 lawyers in seven U.S. offices focus on environmental and natural resource law, litigation and dispute resolution. We help clients around the world resolve critical environmental and sustainability issues relating to their products, facilities, and operations. 

Subscribe for updates via:

Meet the Contributors

Topics

Recent Posts

Click here to learn more about us

Showing 15 posts in NEPA. View our practice description for NEPA.

Executive Order Charts New Path For Offshore Energy Development

On April 28, 2017, the Trump administration issued an Executive Order entitled “Implementing an America-First Offshore Energy Strategy.”  This EO calls for expanded oil and gas leasing in areas of the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) that were recently placed off-limits to energy development, and instructs several federal agencies to reevaluate and possibly reverse recent regulations imposed on the offshore oil and gas industry.  If fully implemented, the EO would clear the way for expanded and expedited development of OCS energy resources.   Read More ›

Interior Secretary Immediately Implements President’s Executive Order on Energy and Climate

New Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke wasted no time implementing the mandates of the Trump Administration’s most recent Executive Order (EO), “Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth,” which was issued on March 28.  For a summary of that EO, click here.  On March 29, the Secretary issued two Secretarial Orders (SO) implementing the March 28 Order, and took additional administrative action consistent with its mandates.  Separately, the Secretary has reinstated a public-private advisory committee to address royalty issues. Read More ›

Impacts of the 2016 U.S. Election on Environmental Law, Policy, and Enforcement

The 2016 election results will have wide-ranging impacts on the future direction of environmental law, policy, and enforcement in the U.S.  With 100 lawyers in offices around the U.S. focused on environmental and natural resource law and litigation, Beveridge & Diamond helps clients navigate legal and business risks arising from this evolving legal landscape. Read More ›

Is the Golden State about to Fumble Away a Golden Program?

Streamlining environmental reviews of highway projects and fixing state highway issues faster with reduced costs, have all proven successful under the NEPA Assignment Program (Program) that California entered in 2007. In fact, California has led the way with this Program by being the only state that participated in the pilot program.  The Program, 23 USC 327,  allows a state to apply for and assume the responsibilities of the U.S. Secretary of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for environmental review, consultation, or other action required under any Federal environmental law pertaining to the review or approval highway projects in the State. States can also apply for the assignment of transit and rail projects. Read More ›

Parker Moore Quoted in BloombergBNA on the Benefits of Science Training for Attorneys

Parker Moore, a Principal in Beveridge & Diamond's Washington, DC office and leader of the firm’s Endangered Species and Wildlife Protection,Wetlands, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) practice groups, was quoted in a BloombergBNA Daily Environment Report article titled "Science Training Gives Some Attorneys Advantages."  The article discusses how training and degrees in the sciences have advantages in the practice of environmental law. Read More ›

USDA Declares “Do-Over” on Overhaul of Biotechnology Regulations

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (“USDA”) Animal and Plant Health Information Service (“APHIS”) is renewing efforts to amend or replace its existing rules governing plant-based biotechnology, while highlighting possible changes to its regulations that may significantly expand the scope of biotechnology products and processes subject to APHIS jurisdiction.  Akin to an advance notice of proposed rulemaking, APHIS’s Notice of Intent seeks public input on scoping for a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (“PEIS”) under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”).  APHIS’s non-exclusive proposals range from status quo to transformative, and its notice provides a rare opportunity for agriculture and biotechnology stakeholders to help shape what may become a wholly new regulatory program to replace APHIS’s three-decades-old regulations at 7 C.F.R. Part 340.  Comments are due by March 7, 2016. Read More ›

To Mitigate or Not to Mitigate: No Longer a Question for Environmental Reviews?

Even the casual college football observer has probably seen by now the wild final play of the Duke-Miami game on October 31. After the game ended, it was determined that Miami literally stole the win as a result of referee errors. The referees were suspended, apologies were issued, but the game result stuck. As a Duke alum, this “mitigation” outcome was of little solace. Read More ›

CEQA Guidelines Comments: Once In a Generation Chance

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) directs that certain proposed projects undergo environmental review to assess and mitigate significant environmental impacts. The CEQA Guidelines provide procedures and clarification on how to perform the reviews. The Guidelines are often cited in legal challenges to CEQA reviews. Read More ›

Court Strikes Down FWS Rule for 30-Year Eagle Incidental Take Permits

In 2013, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) issued a rule increasing the maximum duration from five to 30 years of programmatic permits under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act to “take” bald or golden eagles incident to otherwise lawful activities.  That rule was challenged by environmentalists in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.  On August 11, 2015, the court granted summary judgment for the plaintiffs and remanded the rule.  As a result, for now, 30-year incidental take permits are no longer available to wind energy and other projects under the Eagle Act. Read More ›

As Predicted, California Supreme Court Agrees with CEQA Mitigation Requirement

Last February, I wrote about the California State University Board of Trustees’ (CSU) unique stance concerning their responsibilities under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).  CSU agrees that like every other private developer, it has a duty to mitigate for significant impacts on the environment from its development projects.  However, they do not budget for the cost of mitigation for off-campus impacts as part of the project.  Rather, CSU argues that off-campus mitigation is a separate cost and their only responsibility is to request funds from the Californian legislature and if not appropriated, then CSU can move forward with the project without mitigating. Read More ›