Welcome to the Beveridge & Diamond Environmental Law Portal.
Beveridge & Diamond’s 100 lawyers in seven U.S. offices focus on environmental and natural resource law, litigation and dispute resolution. We help clients around the world resolve critical environmental and sustainability issues relating to their products, facilities, and operations.
Meet the Contributors
- Sarah E. Albert
- Peter C. Anderson
- Benjamin E. Apple
- James M. Auslander
- Gus B. Bauman
- Karl S. Bourdeau
- Robert Brager
- Megan R. Brillault
- Ryan J. Carra
- John G. Cossa
- Richard S. Davis
- Brook J. Detterman
- Henry L. Diamond
- Jacob P. Duginski
- Leah A. Dundon
- Mark N. Duvall
- Daniel A. Eisenberg
- Toren M. Elsen
- Kenneth B. Finney
- Russell N. Fraker
- David M. Friedland
- Kristin H. Gladd
- Aaron H. Goldberg
- Marc J. Goldstein
- Stephen L. Gordon
- Jeanine L.G. Grachuk
- Edward M. Grauman
- Paul E. Hagen
- Karen M. Hansen
- Maryam Hatcher
- Randy E. Hayman
- Lauren A. Hopkins
- Steven M. Jawetz
- Madeleine Boyer Kadas
- Sarah A. Kettenmann
- Eric L. Klein
- Heidi P. Knight
- Daniel M. Krainin
- Jessica L. Kyle
- K. Russell LaMotte
- Jessalee L. Landfried
- Jayni A. Lanham
- Laura L. LaValle
- Brian C. Levey
- Pamela D. Marks
- David H. McCray
- Dacia T. Meng
- Sara Vink Mogharabi
- Bryan J. Moore
- W. Parker Moore
- Megan L. Morgan
- Michael G. Murphy
- Evynn M. Overton
- Gayatri M. Patel
- Donald J. Patterson, Jr.
- John H. Paul
- Raymond N. ("Rusty") Pomeroy II
- Roy D. Prather, III
- Meghan A. Quinn
- Bina R. Reddy
- Elizabeth M. Richardson
- Stephen M. Richmond
- Virginie K. Roveillo
- Alan J. Sachs
- Peter Schaumberg
- Paula J. Schauwecker
- Aron H. Schnur
- Mackenzie S. Schoonmaker
- Daniel B. Schulson
- Lindsey K. Selba
- Timothy M. Serie
- Kaitlyn D. Shannon
- Andrew C. Silton
- James B. Slaughter
- Gary J. Smith
- Timothy M. Sullivan
- Kathryn E. Szmuszkovicz
- Zaheer H. Tajani
- Michael F. Vitris
- Hana V. Vizcarra
- Shengzhi Wang
- Nicole B. Weinstein
- Katherine Eller Wesley
- Benjamin F. Wilson
- Graham C. Zorn
- The Science and Controversy of Offshore Wind: BOEM Embarks on New Research Efforts While Fishing Groups Take Aim at An Offshore Wind Lease In New York
- Will Massachusetts Enact a Carbon Tax?
- Superior Court Decision Raises the Bar For Municipalities Seeking to Challenge Special Permits And Other Zoning Actions Taken By Neighboring Municipalities
Click here to learn more about us
OSHA Proposes December 1, 2017 Deadline for First Phase of Electronic Reporting, Foreshadows Rulemaking on Anti-Retaliation Provisions
On June 28, 2017, OSHA published a proposed rule in the Federal Register delaying the initial compliance deadline for the electronic submission of worker injury and illness logs to December 1, 2017.
 This proposal comes approximately one month after the Labor Department announced through its website that it was indefinitely delaying the original compliance date of July 1, 2017. According to the proposed rule, OSHA intends to launch the website for employers to submit their data by August 1, 2016. This will give employers a period of four months from the launch date to electronically submit their 2016 Form 300A data. Public comment on OSHA’s proposal is due by July 13, 2017.
OSHA’s action does not affect the anti-retaliation provisions that were incorporated into OSHA’s final electronic reporting rule and that went into effect on December 1, 2016. However, OSHA indicated that it “intends to issue a separate proposal to reconsider, revise, or remove other provisions of the prior final rule.” The anti-retaliation provisions are also the subject of pending legal challenges in federal court.
Our previous news alert outlining the electronic reporting rule and anti-retaliation provisions follows below.
In May 2016, OSHA issued a final rule requiring the electronic reporting of certain injury and illness records and issuing new anti-retaliation provisions. Following multiple delays, the anti-retaliation provisions became effective on December 1, 2016. As noted above, OSHA now proposes to delay the first phase-in deadline for the electronic reporting requirements to December 1, 2017.
The implications for OSHA’s final rule on affected employers are significant. Their customers, competitors, and the general public will have quick access to details of their injury and illness history. Potential investors will have new tools available to evaluate employers’ risk and potential liability. State and local governments will likely consider the published illness and injury rates when reviewing bids for large construction contracts. OSHA’s anti-retaliation rules are intended to encourage employers to report workplace injuries despite the fact that the records will be published online and accessible by the public.
Additionally, the final rule may increase employers’ exposure to criminal penalties under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 for false statements to the government. In December 2015, the Department of Justice and the Department of Labor jointly issued a memo indicating that the agencies would “increase the frequency and effectiveness of criminal prosecutions of worker endangerment violations” with a “renewed” commitment. As part of this initiative, DOJ attorneys may begin to carefully examine the injury and illness disclosures required by OSHA’s final rule.
For many years, OSHA has required most employers to keep records of their work-related injuries and illnesses, and to report fatalities and certain serious injuries to OSHA. These regulations appear in 29 C.F.R. Part 1904. The reporting rules were expanded in 2014 to include reporting of all in-patient hospitalizations, amputations, and losses of an eye that occur within specified periods after work-related incidents.
OSHA issued a proposed rule in November 2013 to add requirements for electronic submission to OSHA of injury and illness information employers are already required to keep. The preamble to that proposed rule indicated that the agency planned to post this data on a public website. After comments regarding whether employers might under-report injuries to avoid this publicity, OSHA issued a supplemental notice in August 2014 seeking comment on whether to prohibit employers from taking adverse action against employees for reporting injuries and illnesses. OSHA published the final rule in May 2016.
Key Provisions of OSHA’s Final Rule
OSHA has consistently sought to promote employer safety incentive policies that encourage workplace injury reporting. For example, according to OSHA, a policy that rewards workers for recommending safety improvements throughout a facility may improve workplace safety without discouraging reporting. Other policies, however, in OSHA's view may purposefully or inadvertently deter workplace injury reporting. For example, workers who report an OSHA-recordable injury might be excluded from periodic prize drawings. Or, an employer might provide a cash bonus to a team of employees if no one on the team is injured for a certain amount of time.
Anticipating that employers may discourage reporting by employees of their occupational injuries and illnesses in light of the new posting provision, OSHA has amended the recordkeeping regulations with certain anti-retaliation provisions. While the rest of the final rule became effective January 1, 2017 (with phased-in deadlines to follow), the three requirements below became effective on December 1, 2016:
- Require employers to inform employees of their right to report work-related injuries and illnesses;
- Clarify existing requirements that an employer’s procedure for reporting work-related injuries and illnesses be reasonable and not deter or discourage employees from reporting; and
- Incorporate the existing statutory prohibition on retaliating against employees for reporting work-related injuries or illnesses.
Accordingly, employers may want to review their employee policies to verify that any incentive policies aimed at minimizing workplace injuries and illnesses avoid inadvertently encouraging underreporting.
Electronic Submission of Injury and Illness Data
OSHA’s regulations require employers with more than 10 employees in most industries to maintain records of work injuries and illnesses at their facilities. OSHA’s final rule amends these regulations to require electronic submission of the records employers are required to keep.
Establishments with 250 or more employees must electronically submit their Part 1904 injury and illness recordkeeping forms (Forms 300, 300A, and 301) to OSHA on an annual basis. Establishments in certain industries with 20 or more employees, but less than 250, must electronically submit information from their Part 1904 annual summary (Form 300A) on an annual basis. Employers also must electronically submit information from Part 1904 forms to OSHA upon notification.
OSHA plans to post the company-specific injury and illness data it collects on its public website. OSHA does not intend to post information that would identify individual employees. Furthermore, the published data will be partially restricted by the Freedom of Information Act and certain provisions within Part 1904. For example, OSHA will use FOIA Exemptions 6 and 7(c) to withhold certain personally identifiable information, and § 1904.29(b)(6) requires employers to withhold employee names for injuries and illnesses classified as “privacy concern cases.”
OSHA originally planned to phase in the data collection system as follows:
- Establishments with 250 or more employees in covered industries – Submit information from their 2016 Form 300A by July 1, 2017. These employers must submit information from all 2017 forms (300A, 300, and 301) by July 1, 2018. In 2019, and every following year, the information must be submitted by March 2.
- Establishments with 20-249 employees in certain high-risk industries – Submit information from their 2016 Form 300A by July 1, 2017, and their 2017 Form 300A by July 1, 2018. In 2019, and every following year, the information must be submitted by March 2.
However, as noted above, on June 28, 2017, OSHA proposed to delay the July 1, 2017 phase-in deadline to December 1, 2017.
DOJ Worker Endangerment Initiative
DOJ and DOL have teamed up to increase enforcement and criminal prosecution of worker endangerment violations. One driver for this new initiative is an interest in more severe punishments for safety violations, since worker safety violations are misdemeanors, not felonies under the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Prosecutors are likely to take a broader view of workplace investigations to encompass worker safety violations alongside environmental crimes and traditional felonies such as false statements. The initiative may also seek to use the workplace safety crimes as “hooks” for charges with greater criminal exposure.
In light of OSHA’s final rule, employers should be particularly aware of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 for false statements to the government. The False Statements Act generally prohibits willfully and knowingly making fraudulent or false statements, or concealing information, in “any matter within the jurisdiction” of the federal government. The breadth of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 is wide, and its potential application to OSHA’s final rule has important consequences.
Employers must be diligent about accurately and truthfully reporting workplace injury and illness data consistent with OSHA’s final rule. Company employees charged with reporting the information should be carefully trained on the reporting requirements and should quickly revise any inadvertently incorrect submissions. Records maintained on-site should match records submitted to OSHA.
Beveridge & Diamond's Occupational Health & Safety Practice helps companies nationwide and in a variety of industrial sectors on a wide range of worker safety issues—in the rulemaking, counseling and litigation contexts—with a particular focus on chemicals and processes also regulated by environmental programs. For more information, please contact the authors.
 82 Fed. Reg. 29261 (June 28, 2017).
 See Beveridge & Diamond, OSHA Indefinitely Delays Electronic Reporting Requirements (May 24, 2017).
 82 Fed. Reg. at 29261-62.
 See Beveridge & Diamond, OSHA Issues New Rule on Injury and Illness Reporting and Recordkeeping (Sept. 25, 2014).
 78 Fed. Reg. 67254 (Nov. 8, 2013).
 79 Fed. Reg. 47605 (Aug. 14, 2014).
 81 Fed. Reg. 29624 (May 12, 2016).
 See OSHA Memorandum, Employer Safety Incentive and Disincentive Policies and Practices (Mar. 12, 2012).
 81 Fed. Reg. at 29673.
 29 U.S.C. § 666(e).